Tuesday, January 5, 2021

Reprise of a visit to Domaine de la Romanée-Conti (DRC) with Raj Parr

With a history dating back to 1232, and wines that are revered by collectors, critics, and fellow winemakers alike, Domaine de la Romanée-Conti is the most esteemed of the world's wine estates.


This exalted position -- and limited production volume, customers, and selling effort required -- renders a visit to the property a hard get. Due to Ron's efforts, however, we were able to secure an invitation and visited this hallowed ground in the company of Raj Par. The visit actually unfolded over three days: (i) a visit to the Grand Cru vineyards of Puligny-Montrachet and Chassagne-Montrachet; (ii) an extensive visit to the Vosne-Romanée and Flagey-Échézeaux vineyards; and (iii) a second (brief) trip to the Vosne-Romanée vineyard and the winery visit/tasting.

Currently DRC farms 27.8146 ha of vines distributed among the Grand Cru vineyards illustrated in the maps and pictures provided below. Of that total: 25.54 ha are owned and 2.2746 ha rented; 27.1446 are planted to Pinot Noir and 0.67 ha to Chardonnay; 16.67 ha are in Vosne-Romanée, 8.2 ha in Flagey-Échézeaux, 0.67 ha in Puligny-Montrachet and Chassagne-Montrachet, and 2.2746 ha in Aloxe-Corton; and two vineyards (7.87 ha) are monopole.

Montrachet illustrated by the wine-colored rectangle.
Source: katabami.info.
Chevalier-Montrachet in foreground and Montrachet beyond.

DRC owns vineyards in all of the above Grand Cru properties except 
La Grande Rue and La Romanée. Source: theamailife.blogspot.com


Corton showing the three climats (midpoint, right-hand side) 
wherein DRC has rented land: Les Clos du Roi, Bressandes, 
and Renardes.

                                                 DRC Vineyards and Production
Commune
Grand Cru Vineyard
Size (ha)/DRC Share
Soils
Average Vine Age (Years)
Production (2010 btls)
Vosne-Romanée
La Tâche
6.06/All
Brown calcareous; deeper at top
50
15,763

Romanée Conti
1.81/All
Brown limestone soils 60 cm deep; major clay component
50
4636

Richebourg
8.03/3.51
Brown calcareous over hard limestone
45
11,323

Romanée-Saint-Vivant
9.3/5.29
Similar to Romanée-Conti but deeper
35
13,910
Flagey-Échezeaux
Grands Échezeaux
9.1/3.5
Marl and gravel over limestone; eastern exposure; 230 - 300 m elevation
52
10,834

Échezeaux
38/4.7
Same as for Grands; 3 - 4% slope; 250 m elevation
32
14,935
Puligny- and Chassagne-Montrachet
Le Montrachet
8/.67
Thinner, stonier, less fertile than neighbors
70
2028
Aloxe-Corton
Corton

Rented vyds in 3 climats:
  • Le Clos du Roi
  • Bressandes
  • Renardes





NA/.5721

NA/1.1944
NA/.5081
Late Jurassic soils
N/A
First vintage 2009; total of 8480 bottles in 2010

The farming philosophy that rules at DRC is a "respect for the soils and its equilibrium" with the winemaker's role being restricted to translating the soils' qualities "with fidelity." The vines are farmed biodynamically and yields are kept low (20 to 30 hl/ha versus the permitted 42 hl/ha) through a combination of rigorous green harvesting and old vines. The combination of climate, soils, and viticultural practices ensures delivery of consistently high quality fruit to the cellar for the production of these magnificent wines.

We arrived at DRC estate right on time for our tour and tasting. The DRC office is separated from the street by a walled, paved courtyard with ingress provided through a black wrought-iron door. The gate was locked but there was a communication device on the wall and we used that to announce ourselves. A tinny voice queried as to who we were there to see and whether we had an appointment. We provided the required information and, after a short delay, were buzzed in. We crossed the courtyard and entered the building through the main door. A woman was sitting at a desk to the right of the entrance portal and she asked us to sit and await M. de Villaine's arrival. The M. (Aubert) de Villaine, co-Managing Director and the face of DRC. This was great news to us. 


M. de Villaine literally came down from the floor above and meticulously shook the hands of every person present. He paused for some additional dialogue with Raj and then proceeded to address us as a group. He first thanked us for coming and then apologized for not being able to lead us in the tasting due to a prior commitment. He then introduced us to Bernard Noblet, the DRC Cellar Master who, he said, would be leading us in the tasting in his stead. He explained that we would be tasting the 2013 vintage out of barrels in the cellars below. After some additional dialogue he turned us over to Bernard who beckoned for us to follow him.

Ron and Aubert de Villane

We exited the building via the door we had entered and made our way to a second door which Bernard opened. Small stone steps led down into a series of small, oak-barrel-occupied rooms. While still on the outside, we had each been provided with a wine glass. Bernard was carrying a pail which contained a wine thief and his wine glass.


Our first stop was at the room containing the 2013 Échézeaux. According to Bernard, all of the wines we would be tasting would be in one stage or the other of malolactic fermentation (MLF); this particular wine was approximately 50% through. The 2013 vintage had been a difficult one he said ( a refrain we heard at every stop during our tour of the region) due to widespread rain and hailstorms which kept volumes low.

Bernard working the wine thief


As Bernard began pulling wine out of the barrels for us to taste, he shared some of the estate's winemaking philosophies and practices with us. The chart below is a high level view of DRCs winemaking steps and practices.


The estate harvests its grapes late as it pursues phenolic ripeness. They sort assiduously and will make several passes through the vineyards in their effort to ensure that every berry is picked at optimal ripeness. In his view, wines should be drinkable at any point in their bottled life so they strive to make wines that are accessible but will still age well.

The entire lineup had been tasted by the time we exited the cellars. The wines were in varying stages of malic acid to lactic acid conversion, polymerization had not yet begun softening the tannins, and the micro-oxygenization associated with oak aging had not yet begun to make a meaningful contribution to the final organoleptic characteristics of the wine. There was some hardness to the wines and aggressive tannins in the case of the Grand Echezeaux and Romanée-St-Vivant. Ron found the Corton approachable and in possession of cherry flavors. Bernard described the Richebourg as still awkward, "like a girl that has not gone through puberty." The La Tâche was smoother and more elegant with an element of savoriness. The Romanée-Conti, even at this early stage, manifested finesse and elegance to accompany a florality. Overall, the quality of these wines were unmistakeable.

A couple of times during the tasting, Ron and I looked at each other and smiled in disbelief. We were at DRC tasting the "drops of God" out of barrel in a vintage where production had been severely curtailed so every glass was extremely valuable; with the person (Bernard) who had been responsible for the elaboration of these wines for many a year; accompanied by one of the leading Burgundy experts (Raj); and our wives were along to share the experience. It was fascinating and educational to watch and listen to the interaction between Bernard and Raj. Bernard, while dressed as a farmer, exuded an air of confidence and suave urbanity while his wine descriptors were loaded and suggestive of an appreciation of the fairer sex. He only spoke French while his audience spoke English (with 1.5 exceptions) but he did not allow the facts on the ground to in any way limit his verbosity. Peter Thustrup, a wine dealer specializing in DRC, was along on the tasting and did a yeoman job of translating the Bernard/Raj interactions and Bernard's ruminations for us.

Ron, Jean-Charles, and Peter

We had been down in the DRC barrel cellars for a while so the light seemed especially bright when we re-emerged from our temporary subterranean domicile. Our struggles to adjust to the light did not in any way diminish our high. We had just completed tasting-through the 2013 lineup from barrel and were ready to go talk about it over lunch. But wait. Not yet. Bernard said something and then began walking off into the distance. Peter said that we needed to follow him as the tasting was to continue at the estate's bottle storage facility which was housed in another building a little ways away. This was a welcome, though unanticipated, development. A crowner. A topper. Found money.

We followed Bernard down a few narrow streets for about 250 yards to our eventual destination. We entered through large wooden doors and then immediately stepped down into the obligatory cellar. Except this one was populated by dark, unlabeled bottles set into alcoves, with each alcove identified by the wine contained therein and the number of bottles in the stock.





We rolled by a number of these alcoves until we arrived at a dimly lit room -- which was also the terminal point of the cellar -- furnished with a solitary table positioned centrally and adorned with two candles on stands. Bernard laid his (now) straw basket on the table and disappeared. After a short while he re-appeared with three .375 ml unlabeled bottles which he placed on the table beside the straw basket. We were going to be blind-tasting the wines contained in these bottles and providing our conclusions as to the labels and vintages. We were okay with this. We had two "Somms" in our group.




As he was pouring the first wine, Bernard mentioned that it was from a great vintage where both the quantity and quality of the harvested grapes were high. The wine showed some stemminess along with floral notes and spice. Great complexity and a lengthy finish. Youthful. This wine was revealed to be a 1999 Grand Échézeaux and I do not recall anyone hitting that on the button.

The second bottle, according to Bernard, was from an exceptional vintage. It had a reductive nose which soon gave way to a savory complexity. Ron noted ripe fruit, elegance, and power. This wine had some age on it. Revealed to be the 1990 Grand Échézeaux and my notes do not indicate anyone jumping up and down because they nailed it.

The third bottle had apple-pear notes, a rich oiliness, honey, brown butter, hazelnut, almonds, caramel and a stemminess. I thought the acid level was low. This wine turned out to be a "ringer." It was a 2007 Bâtard-Montrachet, a wine of which the estate only produces 300 bottles for family consumption. Ron felt that it was the best Bâtard that he had ever had. I know that no one got this one right.

Bernard was having such a great time that he brought a fourth bottle to the table. While pouring, he described the wine as the product of a difficult vintage. It had a watery-gold color with a broad, pale rim. On the nose, molasses, brown sugar, caramel, a nuttiness, dates, figs, and mushrooms. Ron thought it had, additionally, tangerine and orange-rind notes. Balanced on the palate. This was a unique wine for both Ron and me. Raj thought that it was a 1977 Montrachet and provided the reasons for his conclusions. It was  a 1977 Montrachet. I was doubly impressed: first by the wine and then by Raj's recall.

Now Bernard had created a monster. We kept saying things like "encore" but he did not get the message. He began trudging purposefully towards the exit. We followed grudgingly. It was over. Now we could go to lunch and talk about our great experiences.

I will cover my tastings of DRC outside of Burgundy in a follow-up post.

©Wine -- Mise en abyme

Sunday, January 3, 2021

Sangiovese, the cultivar at Italy's core: Part I, the clones

Sangiovese is the most widely planted of the Italian varieties (63,000 ha; 10% of all plantings) and is the basis for some of the most important wines in Central Italy. I had previously written about the variety but ongoing research has yielded additional information, requiring an updating of the original material, as well as the way in which it is presented. Towards that end, I will present a more comprehensive view of the variety in four separate posts: clones, viticulture, winemaking, and wines. I begin herein with Part I, clones.

The Variety
The grape, the name of which translates to "Blood of Jove," is small-to-medium in size, round-to-oval in shape, and grows in tight clusters with wings at the shoulders. The skin is thin, with a deep-blue to dark-purple color. The flesh is translucent, seeded, and endowed with high acidity and medium-to-strong tannins.


In addition to the name Sangiovese, the variety has been referenced variously as: Sangiovese grosso, Sangiovese piccolo, Sangioveto, Sangiogheto, San Gioveto, San Zoveto, Prugnolo, Morellino, Brunello, and Nielluccio.

Research has shown it to be the offspring of Calabrese Contenuova and Ciliegiolo but this finding has been disputed by subsequent, competing research results.

A total of 70,948 ha of Sangiovese is planted worldwide, with 63,000 ha of that total located within the borders of Italy. Argentina (2804 ha), Romania (1700 ha), Corsica (1633 ha), California (1371 ha) and Australia (440 ha) are the other "significant" players on the field. Within Italy, plantings are concentrated within the Central provinces but are also to be found in Lombardia, Emilia Romagna, Valpolicella, Campania, and Sicily.

Clones
In their book Chianti Classico, Nesto and di Savino highlight some of the early confusion as regards Sangiovese biotypes. Writings from 1906 had identified two Sangiovese biotypes: Grosso (also called dolce) and Piccolo (also called forte). It was believed that the Grosso biotype had three distinct subgroups: Sangioveto in Chianti Classico, Prugnolo Gentile in Montepulciano, and Brunello (Sangiovese Grosso) in Montalcino. Post the 1990s, however, genetic studies have revealed all of the foregoing to be a single biotype differentiated by the growing environment. According to Professor Malle of the University of Florence (quoted in Nesto and di Savino), Sangiovese is "phenotypically unstable."

From 1960 to 1980, Sangiovese was grown almost exclusively for quantity. The most important goal in clonal research, according to Kerin O'Keefe (Brunello di Montalcino), is improving and stabilizing quality, with disease control as the main focus. Nesto and di Savino identify the characteristics that have the most value for biotype selection as:
  • Early ripening
  • Looser bunches -- less compact bunches allow air and light to pass through, provisding better resistance to many fungal diseases and giving berries in the middle of the bunch the chance to attain phenolic ripeness (O'Keefe)
  • Small bunches
  • Thick skins
  • Small berries
  • Growth that balances fruit and vegetation
  • Disease resistance.
Prior to the 1980s, clonal research on the Sangiovese variety was small scale and carried out primarily at the academic level. For example, Biondi Santi had aligned with the University of Florence and that collaboration at Il Greppo yielded the now-famous BBS11 clone which was itself selected over a number of clones grown at the facility over a five-harvest period (O'Keefe).

During the 1970s, four clones of Sangiovese were propagated for use. Nesto and di Savino refer to these as first-generation clones. They are shown in the table below. Of the four, T19 was never certified because of its virus load.

Table 1. First-Generation Sangiovese Clones (after Nesto and di Savino)

Clone

Organization

Characteristics

R10

Rauscedo

  • Original budwood selected from Lamole in Chianti Classico
  • Known as Grosso Lamole
  • High-yielding clone that was criticized in the 1990s for making pale, thin wines

R24

do.

  • Known as Media Predappio
  • Selected and developed in the Romagnon hills northeast of Tuscany
  • Popular for making fruity and moderately colored wines

F9

University of Florence

  • Selected from Tuscany
  • Deeper color than R10

T19

Viticulturist Remigio Bordessi in Emilio-Romagno

  • Deepest color, most sugar, highest acidity, lowest pH among all clones
  • Floral aromas and firm tannins a la R24
  • Matured later than all other Sangiovese clones
  • Loose bunches
  • Could not be certified because it had two viruses

In 1982, Banfi, in cooperation with the University of Milan, initiated a Sangiovese clonal study which initially identified 650 clones, further whittled down to 180 and then to 15 which represented "the greater part of the grape's inherent variables." From these 15 clones they distilled six (Janus 10, Janus 20, Tin 10, Tin 50, BF 30, BF 10) which were registered in 1996. The foregoing, plus the VCR5 and VCR6 clones selected from Il Poggione vineyards by Rauscedo, comprise Nesto and di Savino's second-generation clones.

Table 2. Banfi Clones (after Banfi)

Clone

Characteristics

BF 10

  • Medium-big clusters and berry, high yield and concentration of phenols and anthocyanins
  • Wine characterized by spicy and phenolic scents with high typicity and significant tannic content

BF 30

  • Medium clusters, medium-big berry, average yield, and high concentration of phenols and anthocyanins
  • The wine shows a high typicity with good structure and phenolic concentration
  • Aromas of red fruits, phenol, and tobacco
  • Good alcohol content

JANUS 10

  • Medium-small clusters and berries, average yield, higher-than-average sugar content
  • Good typicity with greater structure and phenolic content
  • Aroma of ripe apples and flowers

JANUS 20

  • Medium-small clusters and berries, lower-than-average yield
  • Wine of very high typicity, showing a deep color and good polyphenolic and alcohol content
  • Aromas of flowers and red fruits

TIN 10

  • Large cluster, medium berry, average yield, with high phenolic content
  • Aromas of ripe apple, flowers and spice
  • Good structure with high alcoholic strength and a higher-than-average polyphenolic level

TIN 50

  • Medium-large cluster and berries with high yield and polyphenolic content
  • Intense bouquet
  • Good typicity with high alcoholic structure and dry extract

As stipulated by Banfi, the goal of their research was not to identify a super clone but, rather, "a group of clones that together" could best harness the complexity and variability of Sangiovese. "As a result, starting in 1992 all of the new plantings of Sangiovese on the estate are characterized by the presence of at least three selected clones that are complementary to each other, chosen for the individual characteristics of the soils in each vineyard site" (Banfi).

The initiation of the Chianti Classico 2000 study signaled a changing approach to clonal research. This study was initially designed by the Chianti Classico Consorzio in 1987 with the goals of modernizing viticulture in the region and improving the quality of future wines (Tim Gaiser MS). The design of the effort included 16 experimental vineyards (planted over 25 ha) and five research cellars to vinify the grapes. This collaboration between the Chianti Classico Consorzio and the Universities of Florence and Pisa unfolded over 16 years and studied all aspects of cultivation to include cultivars, vine planting density, rootstocks, training systems, and soil management.

The initial portions of the study identified 239 clones in the Chianti Classico area and these were whittled down to 34 (24 Sangiovese, eight Canaiolo, and two Colorino) which had high immunity to common viral diseases. In 1995 these clones were planted to specific vineyard soils and resulted in the identification of eight new clones that were ideally suited to the Chianti Classico region. These clones were characterized by (Gaiser MS):
  • Smaller berries
  • Thicker skins
  • More open bunches
  • More consistency through varied climatic conditions
These eight new clones were registered as CCL 2000 nos. 1 - 8.

Another clone set that bears mentioning is the collaboration between Col d'Orcia and the University of Florence in the former's Poggio al Vento vineyard. The work yielded the SG-CDO-4 and SG-CDO-5 clones in 2003 and the SG-CDO-8 in 2001.

Massal Selection
Nesto and di Savino point to a movement among Sangiovese growers away from clonal selection and towards massal selection. Decanter describes mass(al) selection thusly:
... some growers prefer to plant new vineyards, or replace dead vines ... with wood taken from old vineyards planted before the days of clonal planting. By doing this, they can preserve the clonal variation of these older vineyards, many of which were planted with vines produced from wood taken from a region's successful vineyards. Thus their vineyards are populated with vines having significant clonal variation ...
For Nesto and di Savino, the Sangiovese growers are just plain comfortable with the performance of their selections that they propogate because they have observed their successful performance in the "target environment"over a long period.

I will continue this series with a future post on Sangiovese viticulture.


©Wine -- Mise en abyme

Thursday, December 31, 2020

And then Chateau Latour came calling: The wines of Eisele Vineyard (Calistoga, Napa Valley), 1997 - 2014

Eisele Vineyard is the iconic Calistoga estate famed for its production of world-class Cabernet Sauvignons and Sauvignon Blancs. The quality of the Araujo (most recent prior owners) wines, and the repute of the estate, was of such that Artemis Domaines (owners of Chateau Latour and Chateau Grillet, among other labels) made the trip across the ocean in 2013 and, unbidden, made an offer for the estate. 

History of the Estate
A table on the left side of the estate's reception area exhibits a number of wine bottles, each displaying the label of a winemaker who has, over time, made vineyard-designated wines with grapes sourced from this vineyard. 


As shown in the timeline below, the vineyard's history stretches as far back as does the history of To Kalon and grapes have been planted continuously on the property for the duration. 


When the vineyard was purchased by the Eiseles, they became 60+-year-old grapegrowers. They offered their grapes to Paul Draper of Ridge and he produced a vineyard-designated wine in 1971.

The Araujos bought the vineyard in 1990 and, in short order, built a winery and produced a wine under their own label. The 1991 harvest was shared between Joseph Phelps and the Araujos and they both produced wines under their individual labels.

During their tenure, the Araujos elevated the property from a great vineyard to one of the world's great estates. They introduced organic (1998) and biodynamic (2000) farming with all herbs and preparations used in the latter management process sourced from the vineyard.

Vineyard Visit
Our visit was arranged by Ron Siegel who had met Jean Gerandeau (Sales and Marketing Director, Artemis Domaines) at a Chateau Latour dinner held in Chicago by Hart Davis Hart. I had attended a Wine on the Way Eisele Vineyard Wine Dinner with Antoine Donnedieu de Vabres (Estate Manager) and had had extensive dialogue with him on the integration and labeling strategy. I was excited to see what progress had been made since that discussion.

The estate is 162 acres in size, 38 of which are under vine. It is located to the east of Calistoga and is surrounded by the Palisades Mountain Range, a situation which provides protection from the north winds while still allowing cooling by the westerly breezes that make their way through the Chalk Hill Gap. The nights are cool, resulting in meaningful diurnal temperature variation and its beneficial effect on the fruit.

The vines rest on volcanic cobbly soils which have been washed down from the Palisades and deposited as an alluvial fan by Simmons Creek -- the waterway bisecting the property -- and its tributary. There are gentle slopes between the creek bed and the foothills, the result of long-term gravitational and weathering effects upon the deposited rocks.
Intense storms during the winter months contribute to soil deposition but the creek dries up during the summer months leaving the vines dependent on depth-resident ground water. The stony subsoil facilitates the efforts of the deep roots to get at this water. Irrigation is only utilized when necessary.
The map below shows the configuration of the Eisele Vineyard.
Vineyard map (Source:eiselevineyard.com)

Source: eiselevineyards.com

Sonia Guerlou (Hospitality Manager),
Ron, and Bev
The vineyard is divided into 13 blocks and 40 sub-blocks reflecting “the nuances of soil and subsoil.” The varieties planted in the vineyard are as follows:
·       Cabernet Sauvignon – the best Cabernet Sauvignon is sourced from the plots around Simmons Creek. Less complex wines are made from the younger vines in the eastern part of the vineyard.
·       Cabernet Franc
·       Petit Verdot – Fully ¾ of the vineyard is devoted to the production of the three Bordeaux varieties
·       Syrah – first planted in 1978
·       Sauvignon  Blanc – both Sauvignon Blanc and Sauvignon Musque planted on the eastern side of the property
·       Viognier – Initially planted for co-fermentation with the Syrah; in some years there is enough product to make a varietal wine.
Vines average 25 years of age and are farmed according to biodynamic principles. The estate uses its own herbs and preparations from the vineyard.
Transition Winemaking
With the purchase of Eisele Vineyard, Artemis Domaines gained responsibility for harvesting and production of the 2013 vintage. They, obviously, were responsible for all aspects of the 2014 vintage. We will first examine the production parameters to determine any changes between these two vintages. This assessment will also allow us to get a full inventory of the wines produced by the estate.
Cabernet Sauvignon Estate – In both 2012 and 2013 the wines were made with 100% Cabernet Sauvignon fruit. The winemaking schema employed included: vigilant sorting; slow fermentation with gentle extraction; and barrel-aging with a careful choice of toasts and origins tailored to each vineyard block.
Altagracia – The Altagracia exhibited significant changes in its varietal composition between 2012 and 2014 with the Cabernet Sauvignon percentage increasing and Merlot and Malbec losing their place in the blend. Cabernet Sauvignon went from 71% in 2012 to 81% in 2014 while both Merlot and Malbec went from 6% and 4%, respectively, in 2012 to zero in 2014. The winemaking schema was the same as for the estate Cabernet Sauvignon.
Sauvignon Blanc – The Sauvignon Blanc is generally a blend of Sauvignon blanc (lean, gravelly structure) and Sauvignon musque (slightly exotic flavors). In 2013 this wine was made from 100% Sauvignon blanc while the 2014 and 2015 versions had 68% and 78%, respectively. In 2012 the mix was 75% musque and 25% blanc. It appears as though Eisele Vineyard tried a 100% Sauvignon Blanc in their first year and then thought better of it subsequently.
Beginning with the 2013 vintage this wine was subjected to extended elevage on lees with fermentation and elevage in a combination of stainless steel, French oak, and cement egg. In 2015 the fermentation percentage distribution was: concrete egg, 20%; used oak, 42%; stainless steel, 18%; and new oak, 20%.
Syrah – The Syrah is whole-cluster-fermented in small tanks and aged for 21 months in 50% new French oak. The wine had 1% Viognier in 2012 but was 100% Syrah in 2013.
Viognier– These grapes are whole-cluster-pressed and fermented with native yeasts. The wine is aged sur lie with batonnage in 50% stainless steel and 50% used oak.
Tasting the Wines of Eisele Vineyard
The following notes are curated from a series of tastings in which I participated and have been reshuffled for temporal consistency. The tastings include: post-estate-visit tasting;  Antoine Donnedieu de Sabres, Eisele Vineyard Estate Manager, Luma tasting hosted by Wine on the Way; a Wine Barn Best Cabernet Sauvignon tasting; 2014 DWCC BYOB in Montreux, Switzerland; a Breakthru Beverage Tasting at Del Frisco's Double Eagle Steakhouse in Orlando; and various and sundry lunches and dinners with Ron, Bev, and Parlo.

The 2015 Eisele Vineyard Sauvignon Blanc was reminiscent of a Semillon on the nose. Creaminess, lime, and a burnt character on the palate. Persistence, with a cupric finish which morphed into stainless steel. Ranks among the best Sauvignon Blancs in the Valley.
2013 Eisele Vineyard Sauvignon Blanc -- A beautiful wine. Citrus, goosberry, herbs, and tropical notes on the nose. Bright but balanced on the palate. Mineral. Long, limey finish.


2012 Araujo Altagracia Proprietary Red -- This wine had been opened two hours prior to the tasting and double-decanted. It exhibited chocolate, toast and red fruit on the nose with a savory herb note and oak on the palate and finish.
2013 Eisele Vineyard Altagracia Proprietary Red -- This wine had also been opened 2 hours prior and showed marked differences from the 2012. It showed as more elegant, was less weighty on the palate, and was mineral, lean, and focused. 

Eisele Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon 2014 --  Andrew MacNamara MS pulled this out of his hat as the surprise wine of the night. Way too early. Powerful primary dark fruit and structure aplenty but it gives warning of a fulfilling future.


Andrew MacNamara holding court
while holding the 2014 close
There were marked differences between the Eisele Vineyard Estate Cabernet Sauvignon 2012 and 2013 tasted at the estate. The sense of increased elegance and a fine-boned character evident in the 2013 Altagracia was also present in the comparative tasting of the Estate Cabernet Sauvignons. Ron felt that you noticed more of the oak, riper fruit, and a California style in the 2012 whereas, in the 2013, the fruit is pure and clean, with no noticeable oak. The great structure and balance of the 2013 reminded him of a First Growth Bordeaux.The year 2013 was an exceptional vintage in Napa but I have no doubt that the new aging regime contributed to some of the differences that I observed between the two vintages and, in so doing, made a great wine even better.

2011 Araujo "Eisele Vineyard" Cabernet Sauvignon -- Complex and powerful while still retaining its elegance. Blackberries, raspberries, graphite, baking spices, mint, licorice, and chocolate on the nose. Rich and deep on the palate with ripe cherries and graphite evident. Full-bodied with a long, deep finish.

Araujo Eisele Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon 2008 -- This is a mighty fine wine, exhibiting layered complexity both on the nose and palate. Dark cherry, violets, earth, baking spices, dark chocolate and eucalyptus on the nose. Smooth on the palate with dark and red fruit notes, chocolate, and baking spices. Full-bodied and balanced, with well-integrated tannins. Lengthy finish.


Araujo Eisele Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon 2007 -- Blackberries, blueberries, and currants on the nose along with licorice, eucalyptus, earth and cedar. Restrained and balanced. Silky tannins and long tarry finish.

Araujo Eisele Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon 2006 -- Dark red and black fruit on the nose along with forest floor, chocolate, licorice, tobacco, eucalyptus, and baking spices. Complex on the palate with the fruit following through. Rich mouthfeel but balanced. Silky tannins. Long finish.


Araujo Estate Eisele Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon 2005 -- Great California wine. Was the consensus number one wine of a tough California night including 1994 Dominus. Unlike the 1991 Dominus, you know that this is a New World wine from California. Medium-bodied in an opulent style with good balance and length. Showing notes of blackberry, creme de cassis, forest floor, graphite, licorice, and violets (Ron's notes).


Araujo Eisele Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon 2001 -- Powerful. Blackfruits, licorice, spice, cocoa on the nose. Dense and full-bodied with silky tannins and a long finish.

Araujo Estate Eisele Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon 1998 -- Not the greatest Napa vintage ever. Not as fruit prominent as some of the other wines tasted. Earth, leather, tobacco, red fruit on the nose. Integrated tannins. Medium length.

Araujo Estate Eisele Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon 1997 -- This was supposed to be a great year in Napa but some of the wines have not held up well. Red and black fruit on the nose with licorice, eucalyptus, earth, and smoke. Black and red fruit on the palate along with dried herbs and earth. Fine tannins. Long, elegant finish.


***********************************************************************************************************
As Sonia kept pointing out during our vineyard visit, Artemis Domaines purchased an iconic estate at the top of its game and with a strong and loyal customer base. As in any acquisition of this type, the operating principle is "do no harm." That is, do not give the customer base any cause for concern. The challenge for Artemis was to establish an identity separate from the Araujos without giving the impression they were changing the core product (which was a very high-value product to begin with).

The strategy chosen was to elevate the vineyard name above all else. This goal was accomplished over a three-year period of "gentle, subtle changes." The result is shown in the photo below. The 1991 label shows the vineyard name in the center and the estate name in the bottom right. Both of these textual components are of similar size. The 2013 label has no estate name and the vineyard name is featured prominently, with a font size larger than on the 1991 label.



©Wine -- Mise en abyme