data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4797/a4797b7ff52687555b0987e26c275074a22a1da6" alt=""
The new bottle is only marginally slimmer than the traditional bottle and about 2.3 ounces lighter. Not much of a change you say? One must remember that two (2) factors significantly influenced the decision to alter the Champagne bottle – safety and tradition.
The design of the slimmer bottle required a significant re-engineering in order to handle the
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/917a9/917a9a4fca3d2d7747c9fc935129ba5494efe802" alt=""
Champagne houses go to great lengths to cultivate an image of luxury through packaging and pricing - and will gladly explain to you that other sparkling wines are inferior because they simply are not Champagne. With tradition being a major factor, producers are very reluctant to alter, even in the slightest, the manner in which their product is seen or presented to the consumer. Therefore, the new bottle had to be molded so that consumers would barely detect the difference in the bottle’s classic shape. In order to optimize the efficiency, the new bottle also had to fit all of the existing machinery at all of the Champagne houses.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79f2d/79f2d545eb4c04e6e8a2e2d3aa9bf154650dcab0" alt=""
But this small reduction in weight (from a slightly narrower profile in the shoulder of the bottle) reduced the carbon emissions associated with bottle production alone by 7%. The slimmer shape allows approximately 2,400 more bottles (200 cases) to be transported in the standard truckload, therefore putting fewer trucks on the road. The estimate is that this will result in a reduction of nearly 9,000 tons (18 million pounds) of carbon emitted annually - the equivalent of taking 4,000 small cars off the road.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/148f8/148f897d30fc80681094896194260e3b578b8239" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d127/3d127d4c9fe754b1f6431843a22a60f9103d3718" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93da6/93da6cc7d3ecb4cc5941c1be847168cc77f75484" alt=""
The cost of the bottle is marginally less (dropping from 43 cents per bottle to about 41), but not enough to alter the pricing to the consumer. It will remain to be seen, however, if the savings resulting from the reduction in transportation costs will be offered to the Champagne lovers around the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment